Posted by: John Phoenix
10/12/2024
Should we rejoice in this regime change?
It is amazing how mainstream Western narrative rejoices in a regime change in which a secular and pluralist regime has been replaced by a jihadist, Islamic terrorist regime!
Just a little detail: (euphemistically, only), while Western political correctnes has been agitating for decades in favor of women’s rights (even with some excesses, in my opinion!), Western narrative rejoices in this regime change, let’s say a bit Taliban-like against women rights.
a female member of Ba’ath Party, the only one lay and feminist party in Arab contries
And yet the war Afghanistan war was waged first and foremost to safeguard women’s rights, this, at least, officially, as it was said.
But it doesn’t seem that this new regime shines for women’s rights and equality… Assad was much more feminist, lay and pluralist! Or am I wrong?
the only secular Arab socialist party (the same one that was led by Saddam Hussein in Iraq)
Syria has always embodied the utopia of a single Arab nation. The secular and socialist perspective of the Ba’ath Party on which to build Arab unity has been, since the 1940s, the possible alternative to the confessional divisions introduced by Western colonialism for the control of the Middle East.
The defeat of Ba’athist Syria is not only the defeat of pan-Arabism, the only condition to counter the Anglo-Zionist imperial domination of the Middle East, but the defeat of the Arab civilization itself, traditionally oriented towards a secularism that guaranteed coexistence between the numerous confessions, not only Muslim, a civilization that now can only implode under the blows of a doctrinal predominance that will increasingly characterize the statehood and society of Arab countries shaped in this way by a West whose hegemony is no longer contested.
Dissolution could be the destiny of Syria and will open the way to that of Iran.
(As well as to facilitate the establishment of Greater Israel!)
Western services have worked to break the line of agreements established between Russia and Turkey, the main player in the area, already designated battering ram, to be launched to demolish Iran as requested by Israel and the USA. As they had already done, they used the Ottoman aims of Turkey that has always tried to annex part of the Syrian territories and the city of Aleppo, certainly adding threats of various kinds.
Now the Zionist State will be allowed to start the construction of Greater Israel, so much so that from the Syrian Golan Heights its expansionist aims are already expanding that cannot fail to include the annexation of Lebanese lands in the absence of Iranian support.
The United States instead will settle permanently with military bases to continue to steal oil resources, closely control the entire area, given that Iraq will also become their target, and gather Asian jihadism for the future projection aimed at destabilizing Central Asia, India and China.
One wonders how an event of such destabilizing scope was possible without either of the two powers involved, China and Russia, having had time to prepare for such a possible crisis.
Yet Syria has always been central to the fate of the Middle East and in turn to that of the whole of Eurasia, so much so that if it had not been possible to attack it through the open road of the Ukrainian plains, its heart could always be reached by passing through Iran.
It had to be defended and taken the utmost care of it. Yet the Russians have let Israel target it for years, not wanting to open a front with the United States, allowing the Zionists to destroy weapons depots and military infrastructure.
For this reason, they have played the diplomatic card, trying to break the alliance of the countries that acted as a cordon and support for Anglo-Saxon imperialism, but without considering the corrupt nature of these countries, since the West has made them its trump cards.
The point is that both Russia and China have always believed they could resolve disputes at the negotiating table by believing they were dealing with political elites who were at the head of nations whose interests they served in one way or another.
They never had any doubt that these people could refer to a completely different scale of values and interests since they themselves were subjected to a shadow government whose power is supranational and so widespread throughout the West and beyond that it has represented the true imperial power and has been the driving force behind colonialism since its dawn.
Here, the right direction of a world order governed by that harmony typical of Confucian culture and characterized by the idea of unity in diversity typical of the Russian spirit of the Great Mother who welcomes and unites countless ethnic groups, cultures and religions, ends up offering the bearers of a predatory, mendacious and unscrupulous logic all the opportunities to infiltrate and manipulate the processes of aggregation to the new multipolar order.
Now, this first and stinging defeat can only weaken the front that the South of the world was building where the two powers founded actors demonstrate that they cannot guarantee the protection of the countries that should contribute to the construction of the new order.
This will completely open the doors, never completely closed, to the harmful influence of liberalism in Latin America, while European governments will be allowed to bring to light the true nature of the regime until now hidden behind the mask of democracy.
We must understand that we are dealing with an elite of dominating spirits capable of planning their moves years in advance, where each step is preparatory to the next.
In a 2017 interview with a New York newspaper, reported by the newspaper “Al Chorouk”, the former American Minister of Foreign Affairs, Henry Kissinger declared that throughout his diplomatic career, the only presidents who bothered him were Hafedh Al Assad and his son Bashar Al Assad.
Kissinger explained that the United States believed that Hafedh Al Assad had chased away all “the morons”. But, fortunately for the United States, there are still a few left.
Regarding the “Arab Spring”, the American political scientist of Jewish faith, affirmed that these “revolutions that are shaking the Arab world” did not start in a trivial way “Do you think that these revolutions in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya were for the beautiful eyes of the Arabs?!!
Our targets are Syria and Iran. “he specified in a mocking tone.
He admitted that Hafedh Al Assad was the only personality who defeated him. He added that since August 2011, “the Syrian revolution” has triggered a cold war that will intensify even more in the coming months.
Why Syria in particular? Kissinger replied that Syria is the pole of moderate Islam in the world. Syria is also the pole of Christianity.
The United States, according to him, is working to destroy urban structures related to Christianity and to forcibly displace Syrian Christians.
Saint Paul Conversion on the Way to Damascus, Caravaggio
Indeed, Syria is at the heart of the Russian-American conflict.
The Orthodox of Russia and Eastern Europe belong to Syria by confession.
According to him, the current conflict between world forces is not limited to the domination of oil resources, it is a much deeper conflict.
The American diplomat added that it is because of the “stupidity” of former American President Richard Nixon that the United States was unable to occupy Syria.
“The only solution to crush it is to burn it from the inside, which is what is happening now,” he added.
He concluded that he has always admired the Syrian people who have managed to establish an impressive infrastructure despite the few resources at their disposal.
“It is surprising how a people composed of several ethnic groups and confessions is so homogeneous,” he said.
He stressed that most Syrians actually support Bashar Al Assad and that only 1,511 soldiers have left the Syrian army (then).
The latter has 511,000 soldiers and occupies the 4th position in the latest ranking of the strongest armies in the world (then).
By: Claudio Resta